Bootlegs, Audibles, and Misdirection Plays
“It takes 20 years
to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that,
you'll do things differently.”
Warren Buffet
In case you missed it, here’s where we are – another
nonstop week in the football world, even though it is the off-season. Across college campuses there is talk as well
as premature speculation about top twenty-five rankings and national
championships. High school players have
committed to big time programs. And the
NFL is gearing up for its annual college draft weekend in April.
It’s also another week filled with more
allegations of sexual abuse by football players on college campuses - the same
story that has wrapped itself around college programs and the NFL for the past
few years, except this time it’s different.
This time it’s not about Jameis
Winston and FSU’s cover-up (and
subsequent mishandling of the rape investigation by the Tallahassee Police Department)
– this time it involves 5-time MVP and future Hall of Fame quarterback Peyton Manning, and the
University of Tennessee.
It’s been more than a week since New York Daily
News writer Shaun King wrote that thirteen years ago, USA Today obtained 74
pages of explosive court documents on Peyton Manning, Archie Manning, the
University of Tennessee, and Florida Southern College that revealed allegations
of a sexual-assault scandal, cover up, and subsequent smear campaign of the
victim. The allegations against Manning
— which admittedly pale in comparison to many of the other allegations against
athletes at UT — made it is clear that this is a systemic problem.
You can read King’s article (and links to the 74
page report) here
Since then, apologists have come screaming out of
the woodwork with denials and excuses, using tired clichés like “it happened
while he was in college”, that it was a “prank”, and “boys will be boys”. Like we’re supposed to dismiss allegations of
sexual misconduct and abuse, Peyton’s lies, and his misogynistic attitudes towards
women in the locker room as well as the University of Tennessee’s cover-up. Or that sexual misconduct and sexual violence
have an expiration date. In the days since
the story broke, some writers have called King’s ethnicity and motives into
question – making him the center of the story instead of Peyton and his
behavior. Coverage of the report has spiraled into seriously flawed discussions
of the “crusade” against Manning’s legacy, dissections of how the media handled
the incident 20 years ago, and debate over whether or not Manning’s
genitals made actual contact with the victim’s face (seriously – this has been
a conversation…..).
And then there is Peyton’s family - who even
though they allege Manning didn’t do anything wrong, still went through the
motions of discrediting the victim using both sexist and racist comments when
the incident was first reported at UT. It was nothing more than a joke gone wrong; an
immature student-athlete who accidentally mooned a female trainer while baring
his ass to another male athlete. That's how Manning spun the incident, that's
how most writers reported at it the time, and that's how most writers have written
about it ever since.
These are the same people worried about
Peyton’s legacy and the damage being done to his reputation because that is somehow more important than his
actions. Actions and a despicable act committed by a 19-year old Manning that they tried
excusing on immaturity, even though Manning subsequently defied court orders and
continued disparaging the victim years later, exhibiting not only arrogance and
vengeance, but a deeper, darker level of entitlement.
Ultimately, all of this completely misses the
point. This isn’t — or shouldn’t be — about Manning’s legacy or the semantics used
to describe his actions or the writer who delivered the story.
It’s about sexual abuse. Sexual misconduct. And a college cover-up.
It’s about the rape culture that permeates all
aspects of our society, including the sacred institution of college football.
The way the victim of Manning’s sexual abuse says
she was treated by the people in charge at the University of Tennessee (UT)
speaks to deeper issues of rape culture in sports — the tendency to downplay
stories from people who say they were sexually assaulted in order to protect
athletes’ reputations at all costs - an environment where sexual violence in
any form is excused.
“Complaints of sexual harassment are treated as
jokes and efforts are made to protect the student athletes, and cover-up the
complaint,” the victim’s complaint read.
This is about the toxic culture at UT (like too
many other college athletic programs) over the decades — the constant efforts
to cover up for athletes and dismiss women’s accusations have created an
environment filled with sexual discrimination, alleged rapes, and a “horrible
sexual environment and culture’. Manning’s
actions happened in 1996. Twenty years later, a lawsuit has just been filed
alleging that UT still favors prominent male athletes, and not only ignores but
still covers up stories of women being harassed on campus. This past week, one
football player at the University of Tennessee was arrested for punching and
choking a woman. Another was arrested and charged on a number of child sex
crimes. It’s about a university acting “with deliberate indifference
in response to incidents of sexual assault.”
That deliberate
indifference is what we should be talking about – not the impact of this
story on Peyton’s legacy.
But too many people are willing to overlook facts,
offer excuses, and leave the obvious questions unanswered. Is it because Peyton
is a gifted quarterback? The poster boy for Nationwide and Papa John’s and a possible
post-retirement job with the NFL network, with a cultivated image, and
well-known for being an all-around good guy?
Is it because he’s white? Or is it because we need a hero and we’re
willing to overlook his crimes against women.
Will anyone remember this when Peyton Manning
puts on his gold jacket for induction into the NFL Hall of Fame? His victim
will. Victims of sexual crimes cannot forget what happened to them, put a spin
on it, or leave it behind – pretending it never happened. But there will still be
that Hall of Fame jacket—well-deserved based on what Manning accomplished on
the football field—and there will still be people who want everyone to remember
what a stand-up, moral man Peyton Manning is.
Except this week we learned that he’s not.
Our heroes aren’t supposed to be flawed. But when it turns out they are, we owe it to
ourselves to face the truth – no matter how harsh and no matter how much it
hurts. If we don’t, we're doomed to make the same mistake the next time an
athlete with an "gee whiz" attitude and a cannon-like arm does
something that defies the narrative he’s crafted.
We will continue to turn the other way and deny those
facts while the victims pay the price.
You had me way before *deliberate indifference* AuthorMan ... but I'd seen my heroship sink on the Peyton of my past Wheaties purchase when he pimped the podium for Budweiser on his non-super SuperBowl glory moment. And yeah -- I'd read up on not only the coverup, but the following stories of how the troubles of bringing Peyton-antics to light got career hassles tangling the victim.
ReplyDeleteSucks when heroships sinks.
Sucks more when they keep on keepin' on.
~ AbsolutelySteeler*Kate
A little more follow-up on the Peyton story and his "corroborating witness" from Shaun King:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-new-witness-manning-scandal-appears-20-years-article-1.2553492